Search for: "EchoStar Satellite LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2024, 12:23 pm
Germantown-based Hughes Network Systems LLC, an EchoStar company, Tuesday announced the commercial availability of the Hughes HL1120W Terminal, an electronically steerable antenna-based (ESA) terminal that has received Eutelsat OneWeb approval for operation in its low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite network. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
Echostar Satellite, L.L.C., 529 F.3d 617 (5th Cir. 2008). [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
The age of big data is upon us. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
The petition of the day is: EchoStar Satellite, LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:22 pm
Northern District of Indiana - Plaintiffs DISH Network LLC, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and NagraStar LLC, all of Englewood, Colorado, sued in the Northern District of Indiana contending that Defendants Paulette Kincaide and Linnis Kincaide of Gary, Indiana wrongfully intercepted satellite signals. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:22 pm
Northern District of Indiana - Plaintiffs DISH Network LLC, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and NagraStar LLC, all of Englewood, Colorado, sued in the Northern District of Indiana contending that Defendants Paulette Kincaide and Linnis Kincaide of Gary, Indiana wrongfully intercepted satellite signals. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:24 am
., Echostar Technologies L.L.C. and Nagrastar LLC, all of Englewood, Colorado, filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Federal Communications Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:22 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33, 939 N.Y.S.2d 321 (1st Dept. 2012), decision which held that “destruction that is the result of gross negligence” also “is sufficient to presume relevance. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:22 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33, 939 N.Y.S.2d 321 (1st Dept. 2012), decision which held that “destruction that is the result of gross negligence” also “is sufficient to presume relevance. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm
Sirius XM Radio and EchoStar Technologies, which provide satellite services to the public, seek a clarification and expansion of the term “emergency notifications,” the bands for which receive special protection from experimental licensees. [read post]
18 May 2013, 2:06 pm
Last week’s declaratory ruling came in response to questions referred to the FCC by two federal courts in two separate TCPA-based lawsuits.In one suit, filed against EchoStar Satellite LLC in an Ohio federal court in 2007, a consumer alleged that telemarketers selling subscriptions to EchoStar’s satellite TV service — now provided by the DISH Network — made 30 calls to the plaintiff in violation of the TCPA. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33 (1st Dept.2012); Zubulake v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33 (First Dept. 2012). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 A.D.3d 33 (1st Dept. 2012); and Zubulake v. [read post]
Dish Network Sues Thomas Williams For Copyright Infringement Over Illegal Intercept Using Dark Angel
12 Apr 2012, 2:10 pm
Indianapolis, IN - Copyright attorneys for DISH Network LLC of Englewood, Colorado, EchoStar Technologies LLC of Texas, and NagraStar LLC of Englewood, Colorado have filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indianaalleging that Thomas Williams of Coal City, Indiana infringed DISH's copyrighted works by illegal satellite signal interception. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:02 am
" Read on>>- New York Appellate Court Adopts Zubulake in Imposing Adverse Inference for Handling of E-Mails [Schnader]"In EchoStar, a unanimous First Department panel found that EchoStar Satellite LLC, the owner of the DISH Network satellite broadcasting company, failed in its duty to preserve relevant emails leading up to a contract dispute with Voom HD Holdings LLC, a subsidiary of Cablevision. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:48 am
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division began it’s analysis in VOOM HD Holdings LLC v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 2012 N.Y. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
Thus, " [o]nce a party reasonably anticipates litigation, it must suspend its routine document retention/destruction policy and put in place a litigation hold' to ensure the preservation of relevant documents'" (Voom VD Holdings LLC v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., ___ AD3d ___, 2010 NY Slip Op. 00658 [1st Dept 2012], quoting (Zubulake v UBS Warburg LLC, 220 FRD 212, 218 [SD NY 2003] ). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:04 pm
EchoStar Satellite LLC, ---N.Y.S.2d---, 2012 WL 265833 (N.Y. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
In its opinion VOOM HD Holdings LLC, v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., in which the defendant had appealed from the trial court's grant of plaintiff's motion to impose sanctions for the spoilation of evidence, the First Department of the Appellate Division (in between NY's state trial level courts, unintuitively called Supreme Courts, and NY's highest court, the Court of Appeals), held... [read post]
