Search for: "Employers Mutual v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
App. 3d 438 (1986) (invention developed with employer funding was not made “entirely” on employee’s own time); Dimmig v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
This post assesses the Solicitor General’s argument, in New York v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Steve Lubet
Consequently, the RLSC’s call for an “institutional boycott” would harm NYU students by denying them valuable educational opportunities.[6] The Statement’s rhetoric disappointingly contradicts NYU’s aspirational community values which call for open expression within a climate that fosters tolerance and compassionate understanding, active listening and civil discourse, and self-awareness and mutual respect.[7] We recognize that… [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Giving due deference to the court’s credibility determinations it concluded that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for attorney’s fees. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
While at Notre Dame, Barrett signed a 2012 “statement of protest” condemning the accommodation that the Obama administration created for religious employers who were subject to the Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:23 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The Facts The employer had been aware of vague reports of wrongdoing which had resulted in the employee’s termination. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:23 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The Facts The employer had been aware of vague reports of wrongdoing which had resulted in the employee’s termination. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
One has a sense of Chinese intentions in this regard by its initial initiatives within the UN Human Rights Council (On the Internationalization of China's "New Era" Theory: Brief Thoughts on the UN Human Rights Council Resolution: "On promoting mutually beneficial cooperation in the field of human rights" (A/HRC/37/L.36). [read post]