Search for: "English v. Stevens"
Results 1 - 20
of 385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:42 am
Steven C. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Regner and Jacob Dougherty (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), on Saturday, February 10, 2024 Tags: Controller, delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Kahn v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Regner and Jacob Dougherty (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), on Saturday, February 10, 2024 Tags: Controller, delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Kahn v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm
There was the first English “right to be forgotten” case and the most high profile case of the year was that brought by Sir Cliff Richard against the BBC. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am
This is reminiscent of a similar omission in the restatement by the UK Supreme Court in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2013] 1 AC 236, [2012] UKSC 46, which has since been taken as authoritative for the proposition that residence is not a basis of international jurisdiction under English common law. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:15 am
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm
+ come(v.). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
Brief of Amici Curiae Former Attorney General Edwin Meese III and Professors Steven G. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
A second point of note was the decision of the President of the Court of First Instance in the Plant-E Knowledge v Arkyme[3] case in the Local Division of The Hague, where the President allowed the defendant’s application to amend the language of proceedings from Dutch to English under Rule 323 RoP. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
Steven Calabresi Responds to the Amar Amicus Brief in Moore.] [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm
While the G2/21 status quo may start to crystallize in Dutch case law, this raises a question – in view of e.g. the pending Fibrogen v Akabia UK SC appeal – for the English court: Quo vadis? [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The High Court found that the English Court had no jurisdiction to hear the case, and held that even if it had jurisdiction, the judge would have [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
