Search for: "Eugene Curtis" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Judgment was handed down in favour of the applicant in CURTIS v JASON VICTOR BISHOP TRADING AS CANBERRA NOTICE BOARD (Civil Dispute) [2022] ACAT 59 over defamatory material that was published on the Canberra Notice Board Facebook group between 15 June 2020 to 15 July 2020. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, which required the actual malice test for public officials, but follow-on cases, such as Curtis Publishing v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
" Nonetheless, the Levellers were far ahead of their time (and of Milton) and as Professor Michael Kent Curtis has argued there are "echoes of Leveller doctrines in America. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
In July, Randy blogged about his testimony on court-packing; his testimony relies on a study by Prof. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The final substantive excerpt from the First Amendment section of my Social Media as Common Carriers? [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Talmage, William Robinson, and Eugene Cook,[8]relied on sincere religious beliefs in opposing the CRA and interracial marriage.[9] In addition to members of the clergy, the religious beliefs against the mixing of the races were “deeply held by many people. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold are the results of the 2020-2021 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The offices of Curtis, Marcus, and Dominguez were located in a suite professors called the "Swamp. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
[An important First Amendment holding in a factually fascinating case, which involves an alleged breach of contract, a World War II Medal of Honor, a dispute over a history book, and a discussion of anti-libel injunctions.] [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
Any review of a calendar year at the Supreme Court necessarily includes two different terms: the term that ends in June and the new one that begins in October and will run into the following year. [read post]