Search for: "Evans v. DC DOES"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 6:29 am
A central question in the Mar-a-Lago espionage and stolen documents investigation involves former President Donald Trump’s knowledge and involvement in retaining government records. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 pm
Sophia Dodd for the Atlanta History Center on Reproductive Rights in Georgia: Doe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
Hilton Grand Vacations Company, No. 18-14489, and Evans v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Researchers said this suggests overconfidence can help lobbyists make connections with important people but does not necessarily lead to them being able to influence policies. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
So it’s anyone’s guess what will happen in the DC Circuit. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Washington, DC (Richard P. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
(You discuss, for example, the backlash to Goodridge v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
So what follows is our best interpretation of the position of the fifty states (plus DC and Puerto Rico) on whether any presumption arises when a plaintiff claims an inadequate warning (almost every case) that a hypothetical warning (never in fact given) would have been heeded.One thing we have discovered of particular note (at least to us), is that the heeding presumption is an area where the federal courts have run amok, ignoring their obligations under the Erie Doctrine to leave… [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:48 am
First, the evidence was not obtained by [Statham] illegally, and hence the 4th Amendment does not apply. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Doe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:51 pm
– Washington, DC lawyer David Evans of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives UAS: UAS Operators v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:52 pm
– Washington, DC lawyer David Evans of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Halliburton: U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:39 pm
Evans in 1996– which struck down a Colorado voter initiative that abolished antidiscrimination protections based on sexual orientation –to U.S. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
DauberThird Circuit Schizophrenia Over Student Discipline for Fake MySpace ProfilesPrivate High School Not Liable for Cyberbullying--DC v. [read post]
