Search for: "Evens v. Young" Results 1 - 20 of 6,457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
” Unlike federal RICO, Georgia’s law does not require proving continuity over an extended period – even a short pattern of related crimes can qualify. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
” Unlike federal RICO, Georgia’s law does not require proving continuity over an extended period – even a short pattern of related crimes can qualify. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
” Unlike federal RICO, Georgia’s law does not require proving continuity over an extended period – even a short pattern of related crimes can qualify. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
However, even where the purpose is legitimate, the Court can still convict if it poses undue risk of harm. [read post]
It is arguably a necessary power in order to meet the contingencies that arise over time.In the leading American case, Jackson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Certainly (as discussed above) if older persons are given more (or fewer) options to vote in elections than are young persons, then those young persons (or older persons) have had their right to vote “abridged” (even though they still can vote), since they are not being given equal opportunities. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
As a means of invading privacy, a photograph is particularly intrusive” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Doing so is essential for educating and instilling in our young accountants the critical importance of acting ethically, with integrity and fidelity to the public trust in all our professional activities. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:55 am by Frank Cranmer
In his view, J was “a competent young person with an understanding, maturity, and intelligence which equips him well to make his own decision, and give consent, in relation to the medical treatment issues”, in line with the principles in Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and Another [1986] AC 112. [read post]