Search for: "Ex Parte Russell Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
To remove a case on a “color of office” argument, the removing party bears the burden of establishing what’s called the three-part “Mesa test,” from the Supreme Court case by that name,[5] The three-part test requires the defendant to show they: were an “officer, or any person acting under that officer, of the United States” are facing criminal charges “for or relating to any act under color of such office”; and have raised or… [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
Army Corps of Engineers the power to regulate the “discharge of dredged and fill material to the waters of the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 12:29 pm by Russell Knight
“A party served with the written request shall…serve upon the party so requesting written objections on the ground that the request is improper in whole or in part. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
A hedge fund consultant’s assessment of the meeting spread through parts of the investment world and traders spotted the immediate significance: the president’s aides appeared to be giving wealthy party donors an early warning of a potentially impactful contagion at a time when Trump was publicly insisting the threat was nonexistent. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Law has developed in large part due to philosophical inquiry, and the study of philosophy remains just as relevant today. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Petrotech Resources Corp., 325 S.W.3d 302, 313 (Ky. 2010); Balboa Island Village Inn, 156 P.3d at 352 (Cal.); Sid Dillon Chevrolet v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:28 am by Jim Sedor
… Kansas is not part of my territory,” Davis said. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Non-Compete and Trade Secret News for the week ended February 3, 2017***Defend Trade Secrets ActI alluded to this case in my prior post.But we have another federal district court case that discusses the Defend Trade Secrets Act and the ex parte seizure order. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Though the state supreme court held that, as a matter of state law, the trial court erred in conducting the hearing ex parte, it determined that the errors were harmless. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
They filed the copyright renewal in 1991 Petrella also claimed $1 million in damages from alleged copyright infringement on the part of MGM and 20th Century Fox, who had profited from DVDs of the famous film. [read post]