Search for: "Ex Parte State Ex Rel. At" Results 1 - 20 of 2,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
It revived the shareholders’ claims in relevant part, concluding that a plausible claim had been made that Facebook’s statement of “risk factors” was fraudulent and that the shareholders had adequately pleaded it. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 1:26 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
” Originally from Washington state, her closest family and friends are scattered around the country. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
In an unusual move, the United States filed a brief supporting further review. [read post]
31 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
As part of his plea deal, Salame agreed to pay a $6 million penalty and more than $5 million in restitution, in addition to forfeiting his Porsche 911 Turbo and two properties in Massachusetts. [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:45 am by Norman L. Eisen
They will be followed by the People, led by their most experienced prosecutor, Joshua Steinglass (as was stated during the opening statement). [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
And, it is placed within a section [Article I, § 9] of other such limitations [such as] “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed”) and “No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State, [to be contrasted with Article I, § 8, which provides that] ”“The Congress shall have Power To . . . [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:06 am by Adam Klasfeld
Klasfeld’s reporting is part of Just Security’s Trump Trials Clearinghouse. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Federal Prosecutors Reissue Criminal Charges Against Ex-Rep. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
$2.7 Million Insight FCA Cyber Settlement The $2.7 million Settlement settles a whistleblower lawsuit, United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  The key to navigating this distinction is not “whether making official announcements could fit within the job description; but whether making official announcements is actually part of the job that the State entrusted the official to do. [read post]