Search for: "Exelis, Inc. "
Results 1 - 20
of 5,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
Speaking as an ex-transactional lawyer, however, I would like to have seen brighter lines than the opinion offers. [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:45 am
“[S]ince this story came out in 2018, became public, she’s made hundreds of thousands of dollars because of it. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Capital, Inc., 33 N.Y.3d 84, 89 (2019), “[t]o preserve an argument for review by this Court, a party must raise the specific argument in [the trial court] and ask the court to conduct that analysis in the first instance . . . . [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Kentucky ex rel. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:37 pm
Cir. 1997) and Epcon Gas Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
This week the Tenth Circuit vacates that opinion and requests supplemental briefing on how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
In Circuit City Stores, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
” hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm
The Arizona firm waited for their bank’s notification that the check they received from the “debtor” was valid before issuing payment to “Groat Machinery, Inc. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:47 pm
Time Consumer Marketing, Inc., 336 Ill.App.3d 74 (2002)), (People ex rel. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:25 am
Appearance of Impropriety Standard COFC relied on the standard set forth in NKF Engineering, Inc., v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
$2.7 Million Insight FCA Cyber Settlement The $2.7 million Settlement settles a whistleblower lawsuit, United States ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2024, 10:16 pm
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. serves nearly 23,000 financial advisers and manages over $1.44 trillion in advisory and brokerage assets as of March 31, 2024. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
For example, in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
