Search for: "F. T. C. v. Nelson" Results 1 - 20 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm by Eric Goldman
The puts all of Section 230 jurisprudence in a blender and says the proper technique is to apply the legal concept of “duty,” leading to this recap: If [the legal duty] springs from something separate from the defendant’s status as a publisher, such as from an agreement, see Barnes, 570 F.3d at 1107, or from obligations the defendant has in a different capacity, see Lemmon, 995 F.3d at 1092, then § 230(c)(1) does not apply. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 68, 2024).Linda C. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[5]  Finally, the Commission’s mandatory language states that “[i]f Defendant breaches this agreement, the Commission may petition the Court to vacate the Final Judgment and restore this action to its active docket. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Judge Weinstein observed that when the hand waving stopped, “[t]here is no evidence that plaintiffs were exposed to the far higher concentrations involved in both animal and industrial exposure studies. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Many can’t be bluffed by reporters and opinionists who don’t know their file. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:29 am by Jon Sands
Fed R Crim P 41(f)(1)(c ) requires a complete copy of a warrant to be left. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Litig., 858 F.3d 787, 793 (3d Cir. 2017) (affirming exclusion of causation expert witness) Magistrini v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
In June 2018, based upon allegations that respondent Reymond F. was the child’s father, Reymond F. was added as a named respondent to the petition. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 230(c)(1) immunity from libel and similar lawsuits has likewise allowed platforms to amass and deploy financial resources on a scale that few corporations can match. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
    ¶8 Second, as an alternative ground for dismissal, the court determined Utah Code section 30-3-10.4(1)(c)4 “means what it says” regarding the use of dispute resolution procedures to resolve disputes related to the modification of custody. [read post]