Search for: "F. V. C. v. Department of Public Welfare (Majority Opinion)"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
It is therefore important to adopt measures to protect the general welfare and the interest of the collectivity as a whole under the concept of public order (ordre public). [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 79–80 (D.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
There are also four cases challenging the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
C. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
The new rules do not apply to disclosures regarding health and welfare benefit plans, which the DOL believes to be a more challenging matter that requires further study. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am
This has long been a major compliance issue and risk factor for many nonprofits. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
C. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
” GCR 1963, 516.5 required that civil procedure rules be followed.12 The issue of whether the court rules were to apply to condemnation cases has been relitigated and affirmed on numerous occasions.13 C. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
But the power of these societal efforts becomes clear from time to time as these societal and hybrid institutions flex their (private) muscle to further (domestic) public objectives (e.g., here). [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
Although public officials are free to express their opinions and may condemn viewpoints or groups they view as inimical to public welfare, they cannot abuse their regulatory authority to retaliate against disfavored advocacy organizations and to impose burdens on those organizations' ability to conduct lawful business. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
Agency Contact: Ana Torres-Davis, Attorney Advisor, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004, telephone (202) 272-2019, e-mail: atorresdavis@ncd.gov. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
C. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
” c. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
The Court of Appeal distinguished two of our opinions interpreting the Act — Delaney v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
See, Animal Welfare International Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 1222 (2003). * * * * *The obvious importance of the case prompted our grant of certiorari. 542 U.S. 936, 124 S.Ct. 2909, 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004). [read post]
