Search for: "FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF COMMERCE v"
Results 1 - 20
of 215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
For the first time since the 1930s, the Court declared a federal law—a ban on firearms possession in school zones—beyond the Interstate Commerce Clause. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:30 am
UBANK (TN) v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
In 1998, forty-four countries and thirteen non-governmental organizations came together in Washington for the first conference to specifically debate the restitution of Nazi-looted art. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
In National Small Business United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
Dep't of Commerce, which were argued on January 17. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
Although the legal history of boycotts in America is complex, boycotts have widely been considered protected speech since NAACP v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
In sum, Professor Amar's broad readings of the Commerce Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, the First Amendment, and the Fourteenth Amendment all suggest a broad reading of the requirement that the words "Direct Taxes" impose today. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:30 am
Presumably Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce—i.e., the power to “regulate commerce . [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
He had a historic career of public service, including as Chair of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, which held that the federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (“ICCTA”) does not preempt CEQA for a new railroad project, and that the State of California, as the railroad operator, could opt to subject itself to CEQA review without conflicting with the ICCTA. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
The history of price regulation was noted briefly by the Supreme Court in Munn v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Recent policy responses include greater law enforcement activity on interstate roads,[7] differential tax rates near low-tax jurisdictions,[8] banning common carrier delivery of cigarettes,[9] and cracking down on tribal reservations that sell tax-free cigarettes.[10] However, the underlying problem persists. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
(citing Bowen v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
For the first time ever, the bill provides authority to the U.S. [read post]
