Search for: "FORMER EMPLOYEES IBM CORP V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
International Business Machines Corp., March 10, 2020, Caproni, V.). [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 12:58 pm
Waldera Seyfarth Synopsis: In Rusis, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
All employees within a class of employees eligible for the ICHRA must be offered reimbursement coverage on the same terms with limited exceptions that allow differentiation based on age, number of dependents, and status as a former employee. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Gulf Oil Corp., 597 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1979). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
Operations cease – no ability to track accounts receivable, issue invoices, and pay bills and employees. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:46 am
For more information, please choose to follow the case further at International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:17 am
International Business Machines Corp., June 7, 2016, Rogers, Y.). [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
According to Robert Milligan, the former employee's breach of her non-disclosure agreements could qualify as a violation of the CFAA as it is currently interpreted. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
JPS Elastomerics Corp, barred a former employee and his new employer not only from using the stolen trade secrets until such time as they are no longer trade secrets (if that should ever happen), but – for five years – from producing a similar product by any means. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:59 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 2/16/11Cite: IBM Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:40 am
In International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:11 am
Google is either paying its own employees to develop technology or it’s paying another company’s employees to do it. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
Brookstreet Securities Corp., Civil Action No. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
In an article entitled “Courting Cooperators: The SEC’s Effort to Motivate Individual Cooperation,” we analyzed the challenges the SEC faces in trying to mirror in the civil enforcement context a practice more widely used in the criminal context. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:05 am
At a hearing in February 2009, counsel to Mattel conveyed that Mattel was interested in settling the litigation and that there had been some activity on this front.In International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Alpex Computer Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Supreme CourtØ Public Citizen's Sup Ct Watch list for 4/3 Conf hereØ SCOTUSblog's Petitions to Watch for 4/3 Conf hereØ Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases - Pending & decided herePetition for Cert Granted:DecidedCrawford v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes… [read post]
