Search for: "Fair v. Cochran"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
Through a blend of parody, fair use, and keen societal commentary, MSCHF, a collective known for its provocative and often controversial projects, has carved out a unique space in the art world, sparking discussions on the limits of creativity, ownership, and free speech.[2] In the realm of appropriation art, artists remix, repurpose, and reimagine existing works to create something new. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
Compare, e.g., Cochran v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
A Law That Helped End Slavery Is Now a Weapon to End Affirmative Action MSN – Julian Mark (Washington Post) | Published: 11/6/2023 The Civil Rights Act of 1866, which established citizenship for newly emancipated slaves, has become central to the legal battle over what is fair and equal when it comes to race in the workplace. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
I was a guest on this episode, together with Niall Ferguson and John Cochrane (moderated by Bill Whalen), discussing Students for Fair Admissions (from last Term), Missouri v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
The Court has granted a petition to review the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Cochran v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:12 am
Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:24 am
More recently, Judge Andy Oldham opened up on Wilson in Cochran v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 2:58 am
Cochran and Christine L. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Balkin, Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:37 am
Cochran, Jr. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:14 pm
Black, NAACP v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
Brandenburg v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
E.g., SEC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
In KT4 Partners LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
The Hugh Stephens Blog has a post entitled “Fair Use or Fair Dealing? [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:54 pm
It is also now well-established that the motive of the employee is irrelevant; see Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets PLC [2016] UKSC 11 which is another leading case on vicarious liability, in which Morrisons were held to be vicariously liable for a violent assault carried out on a customer by one of its employees (it is fair to say that Morrisons has had a bad run of late with its employees). [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]
