Search for: "Fair v. Poole"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
" Ricci v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
(I posed the question both on the administrative law profs listserve and to a usual suspects list of antitrust scholars—there’s a fair bit of overlap between those groups). 17 people answered, roughly half from the ad law pool and half from the antitrust pool. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
It merely injects fear in those assigned or called to participate in the proceedings, that not only they, but their family members as well are ‘fair game’ for Defendant’s vitriol. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:35 am
The court’s denial of review in Mckesson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
” Pennsylvania: Statutory Default Provisions Codifying “Pick Your Partner” Principle Defeat Claims by Assignee of 50% LLC Membership Interest If the court’s decision in DiDonato can be likened to an easy basketball layup, the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Larikov, LLC v Cao (read here) equates to a slam dunk. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:10 pm
In Cornell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
Through a blend of parody, fair use, and keen societal commentary, MSCHF, a collective known for its provocative and often controversial projects, has carved out a unique space in the art world, sparking discussions on the limits of creativity, ownership, and free speech.[2] In the realm of appropriation art, artists remix, repurpose, and reimagine existing works to create something new. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
“Notices to Importers” for each of the categories include “Eligibility Criteria” limiting imports to allocation holders determined pursuant to a pooling system with separate access for processors, further processors, and distributors and “Calculation of Allocations” which set specific percentages reserved for each eligible pool. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:05 pm
To be fair, this wasn’t just any fifth grader. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:02 am
” The US Supreme Court opined about the lack of jury diversity as early as 1940 in Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:58 pm
In Etheridge v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am
David French suggested that an admissions process, openly crafted to effectuate intentional racial discrimination, was “race neutral” and constitutional might reflect the Supreme Court’s effort after Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
Fourteen months after the court declined to block the school from using the new policy, the justices issued their decision in Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:55 am
Dorf (Cornell Law School) has posted Race-Neutrality, Baselines, and Ideological Jujitsu After Students for Fair Admissions (Texas Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
SCOTUS Repeated Relisting of a Case on the Meaning of Race Neutrality--and a Plug for my new Article
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Last year, in the course of severely curtailing race-based affirmative action in higher education (and likely in other contexts too), the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
It also requires consideration of the conventional wisdom about who benefits from litigating in federal court and how that informs litigation strategy, as well as very recent legislative initiatives aimed at unveiling the beneficial owners of LLCs.Federal v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:30 pm
” Justice Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
