Search for: "Farmer v. State for Use of Russell"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It’s not simply how one tells the dancer from the dance; it’s also how one evaluates performances of Mozart or Beethoven on “original instruments,” as Malcolm Bilson performed, or on the most advanced Steinways, as was the case with Russell Sherman. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:35 pm
Brawner 21-1210Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should apply the subjective test for deliberate indifference set forth in Farmer v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 12:21 pm
Big banks challenge a Washington state surtax on Washington-based bank income Washington Bankers Association v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
Thus where two or more factories independently pollute a stream, the plaintiff’s use of the water may be treated as divisible in terms of degree, and may be apportioned among the owners of the factories, on the basis of the respective quantities of pollution discharged into the stream. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:12 am
., Editor, First Reference In Liebreich v Farmers of North America, 2019 BCSC 1074 (CanLII), the plaintiff brought an action for wrongful dismissal against her former employer and a group of entities she claimed were jointly and severally liable. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 1:24 pm
” The two companies were sued for buying cocoa from, and providing assistance to, farmers in the Ivory Coast, who used child labor trafficked from Mali. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
”) Farmer v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am
At The National Law Review, Jana Slavina Farmer discusses the court’s opinions in two copyright cases this term, Rimini Street Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:38 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioner in Michaels v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
The federal law at issue prevents states from using information on or attached to a Form I-9, the form used to verify eligibility to work in the United States, in a criminal prosecution, the government told the justices, but it does not prohibit states from prosecuting someone using “information drawn from documents other than the I-9. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Beth Farmer analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
” At Governing, Liz Farmer reports that South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
Beth Farmer analyzes Monday’s argument in Ohio v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Beth Farmer had this blog’s preview. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:47 am
I recently discussed an important victory for farmers in the case of Branton v. [read post]
