Search for: "Farrar v. Farrar"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
& Pol'y Rev. 53, 66 & n.49, 98 & n.207 (1999); see also Timothy Farrar, Manual of the Constitution of the United States of America 436 (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 3d ed. rev. 1872) ("The general power of impeachment and trial may extend to others besides civil officers, as military or naval officers, or even persons not in office, and to other offences than those expressly requiring a judgment of removal from office . . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 1:01 am
The author begins this decidedly different approach to American history by pointing out that on December 7, 1941, Japanese planes attacked not just Pearl Harbor, but also the U.S. territories of the Philippines, Guam, Midway Island, and Wake Island. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Doucet was acquitted at trial by Justice David Farrar, and his verdict was unanimously upheld by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
(CSIRO) v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 6:54 pm
The most recent Supreme Court of Canada decision is Tataryn v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am
He is instructed by Marcus Farrar of Chivers Solicitors, and led by Hugh Southey QC. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Here is my submission to the OPC consultation. ______________________________________________ Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the OPC’s consultation on artificial intelligence (AI) as it relates specifically to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Here is my submission to the OPC consultation. ______________________________________________ Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the OPC’s consultation on artificial intelligence (AI) as it relates specifically to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
Farrar v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
Marco Rubio’s tweet about Bolton’s testimony, 1/6/20 United States’ Supplemental Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing, U.S. v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:12 am
Normally, when plaintiffs win only one dollar at trial, they get no fees, as per a Supreme Court ruling, Farrar v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
See Barnett v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
This stems from Farrar v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:19 am
Farrar v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 6:28 am
– Tariq Ali (from his review cited below)I want to recommend, without reservation, Tariq Ali’s review of Sujatha Gilda’s book, Ants Among Elephants: An Untouchable Family and the Making of Modern India (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2017), “The Unseeables,” in the latest issue of the London Review of Books, Vol. 40, No. 16 (30 August 2018).See too Pankaj Mishra’s review, “God’s Oppressed Children,” for The New York Review of Books, December… [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm
For stories that tell of the ‘rise of the machines’ with foreboding are not about man v. machines at all, but about conflict within humanity, and whether it possesses the collective self-love needed for its own self-preservation, or whether shame, greed, and ignorance shall produce division and ruin.[3] And so, making space for human agency requires we supplement the goal of efficiency (at which machines may often excel) with other goals. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
