Search for: "Feist v. Feist"
Results 1 - 20
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
2022cv1564-24 [9] Feist Publications, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Nation Enterprises, Feist Publications v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 8:27 am
And as I pointed out here, disembodied designs are already automatically (and costlessly) protected by copyright as long as they can meet the low standard of creativity mandated by Feist v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:39 am
In my opinion, there has never been any talk of such works, because that would be the same as talking about non-distinctive trademarks.Human authorIt is well known that copyright protects products of the human mind (see Feist v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
%E2%80%9D [2] Id. [3] Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:19 am
Feist, 76 Ill.App.2d 99, 106-07; 221 N.E.2d 418, 421-22 (4th Dist.1966). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
” [Feist Publications v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 9:09 am
Enhanced by Equustek v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Denying injunctive relief may support the public interest, TD Bank v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
In 2016, Leonard v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm
Experiment asked about fairness between songwriters with prior relationship v. met through an ad. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
” The Supreme Court in its decision in Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:25 am
In Feist v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:07 pm
Feist cites INS v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am
My IP law students just finished reading Feist vs. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:09 am
§102(a)), with “original” consisting of two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity (Feist). [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:10 pm
” Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
