Search for: "Ferrara v. Abrams"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 11:42 am
Eisman, senior partner in Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Einiger, LLP. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am
In Burbacki v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 04128 Decided on May 29, 2019 the Appellate Division, Second Department explains why: “The commencement of a bankruptcy proceeding creates an “estate” that is comprised of “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case” (11 USC § 541[a][1]; see… [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:57 am
Abrams, Fensterman, Eiseman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, supra 172 AD3d at 1300, citing Williams v. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Tiger v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am
Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; see generally CDR Créances S.A.S. v Cohen, 23 NY3d 307, 315; ), no such cause of action has been pleaded in this case (see DeMartino v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, 189 AD3d 774, 775). [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 6:34 am
Kelton is a Partner at Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 5:05 am
Abrams, Fensterman, Eiseman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, supra 172 AD3d at 1300. citing Williams v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
Plaintiffs, however, failed to sufficiently plead how the concealment of this relationship caused plaintiffs any damages or led to any adverse rulings in the divorce action (see Saporito v Branda, 213 AD3d 588, 589 [1st Dept 2023]; DeMartino v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, 189 AD3d 774, 776 [2d Dept 2020]; Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2018]; cf. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
Here, the first cause of action adequately pleaded a claim to recover damages for violations of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Bianco v Law Offs. of Yuri Prakhin, 189 AD3d at 1329), as it alleged that the defendants Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP (hereinafter the law firm), Howard Fensterman, and Sarah C. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
Here, the first cause of action adequately pleaded a claim to recover damages for violations of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Bianco v Law Offs. of Yuri Prakhin, 189 AD3d at 1329), as it alleged that the defendants Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP (hereinafter the law firm), Howard Fensterman, and Sarah C. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
Plaintiffs, however, failed to sufficiently plead how the concealment of this relationship caused plaintiffs any damages or led to any adverse rulings in the divorce action (see Saporito v Branda, 213 AD3d 588, 589 [1st Dept 2023]; DeMartino v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, 189 AD3d 774, 776 [2d Dept 2020]; Jean v Chinitz, 163 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2018]; cf. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:59 am
To state a cause of action to recover damages for fraud, which must be pleaded with the requisite particularity under CPLR 3016(b), a plaintiff must allege “[a] misrepresentation or a material omission of fact which was false and known to be false by the defendant, made for the purpose of inducing the other party to rely upon it, justifiable reliance of the other party on the misrepresentation or material omission, and injury” (DeMartino v Abrams, Fensterman,… [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:53 am
In Pinsky v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:48 am
Spolzino, of Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, of White Plains, represented the mother. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
