Search for: "Ferreira v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
To succeed on a cause of action sounding in negligence, the plaintiff must establish that the defendants owed her a special duty of care (see Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298, 317; Wilson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 167 AD3d 820, 820; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d 696, 697). [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
To succeed on a cause of action sounding in negligence, the plaintiff must establish that the defendants owed her a special duty of care (see Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 38 NY3d 298, 317; Wilson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 167 AD3d 820, 820; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d 696, 697). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
., State Consumer Protection Law (2022). [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:03 pm
The Court similarly rejected Ferreira de Sousa’s argument that the United States human rights principles bar the return of A.S.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm
It must also pay R$ 1.5 million ($320,000) to the State Fund for Consumer Protection and Defense. [read post]
28 May 2023, 5:06 am
” Baran v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm
However, various Ericsson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Wilson, dissenting, is set out in Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 2022 NY Slip Op 01953, decided on March 22, 2022. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Wilson, dissenting, is set out in Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 2022 NY Slip Op 01953, decided on March 22, 2022. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:49 pm
*** The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has inquired whether New York’s ” ‘special duty’ requirement” applies “to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence” or if it applies only to claims premised upon a municipality’s negligent “failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury inflicted other than by a municipal employee” (975 F3d 255, 291 [2d Cir 2020]). [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 7:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
In fact, this is exactly what happened in the recent New York case of Ferreira v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:03 am
The trial court took away that verdict, and now the case has been handed off the New York Court of Appeals to decide a tricky state law question.The case is Ferreira v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 9:32 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:40 pm
Having the foundation of In re Ferreira torn out from under it and supplanted by the infinitely friendlier, though also unbinding, Palmer v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:15 pm
Lynch: Re-Assessing the Weight Placed on Credible Fear Interviews in Determining Credibility," Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, vol. 36, no. 2 (2018)"Weathering the 'Perfect Storm': Welcoming Refugees While Protecting the United States at Home and Abroad," Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 57, no. 2 (2018)Related post: - Open Access Round-up: 15 July 2018Tagged Publications. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
"A Quiet Change in US Policy Threatens Immigrants Who Apply for a Change in Status," QZ, 7 July 2018 [text]"Re-Victimization and the Asylum Process: Jimenez Ferreira v. [read post]
