Search for: "Fine v. Rubin" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am by Adeline Chong
This is reminiscent of a similar omission in the restatement by the UK Supreme Court in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2013] 1 AC 236, [2012] UKSC 46, which has since been taken as authoritative for the proposition that residence is not a basis of international jurisdiction under English common law. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Seila Law v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson report that in separate concurrences, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch supported “incorporating the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause to the states by way of the privileges or immunities clause instead of via the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause,” “a view of the Constitution that could be incredibly consequential were it to eventually find favor with a majority of justices. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, and Culbertson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:52 pm by Mitch Stoltz
The well-known case of Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]