Search for: "Fish v. Fish" Results 1 - 20 of 5,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
” Many other Nigerian judges have since followed this individual approach taken by Oputa JSC, despite the majority of the Nigerian Supreme Court in Sonnar unanimously, and repeatedly in Nika Fishing Company Ltd v Lavina Corporation (2008) 16 NWLR 509, and Conoil Plc v Vitol SA (2018) 9 NWLR 463, expressing preference for the enforcement of a foreign jurisdiction clause, except where strong cause is advanced to the contrary. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 2:07 pm by Unknown
(Off-Reservation Fishing Rights) Tohono O'odham Nation, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:18 pm by Joseph Stacey
It is with great sadness that we report the tragic incident that unfolded after a collision between the 58-foot F/V VIS and a 20-foot skiff in Wrangell Narrows, Alaska. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The captains are challenging a Department of Commerce regulation that requires them to pay the salary of federal observers they bring on board to monitor the catch and ensure the crew follows other fishing regulations.The court is being asked to overturn a 1984 precedent – Chevron v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am by Eric Goldman
Newport Fishing * IP/Internet/Antitrust Professor Amicus Brief in 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:10 am by Scott Bomboy
Department of Commerce, the justices will decide a dispute involving a challenge to commercial fishing regulations issued by the federal government. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:53 pm by Joseph Stacey
Northline Seafoods has announced the inaugural voyage of its latest vessel, F/V HANNAH, setting sail from Bellingham’s Fairhaven Shipyard to Bristol Bay for the 2024 salmon fishing season. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
” Jobiak’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Copyright Infringement Claims on AI-Created Database — The latest on one of the few cases, like Thaler v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 8:30 am by Unknown
(Fishing Treaty Rights; Factual Findings) United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]