Search for: "Fitzgerald v. Open Hands"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
Cal. 1999) 196 F.R.D. 562, 568; Fitzgerald v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:52 am
V. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
This does not mean there cannot be other restrictions on voting, but the government must justify them under section 1: see, for example, Fitzgerald v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
Scott Fitzgerald (born September 24, 1896, in Saint Paul, Minnesota; died December 21, 1940, in Los Angeles, California). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
In Nixon v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
When a swab of his hands detects possible explosive materials, he's told he must undergo a pat-down. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Fitzgerald—in a federal lawsuit in the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:56 pm
But as Judge Mehta noted, Fitzgerald held that presidential immunity did not depend on the legality of the president’s action. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm
But instead of fostering an open and honest dialogue, a handful of states — including Texas, Tennessee, Idaho, and Oklahoma, among others — are passing censorship bills that ban conversations about race and gender in public schools. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
PHOTOS: President Trump's Mount Rushmore speech"We gather tonight to herald the most important day in the history of nations: July 4th, 1776 [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
... [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:16 am
Second, in Pearson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
True, Teague left open the possibility of an exception for "watershed rules" "implicat[ing] the fundamental fairness [and accuracy] of the trial. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:48 am
Supreme Court will take another crack at standards of proof in employment cases later this Term when it hands down its decision in Babb v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
No, this my hand will rather the multitudinous seas incarnadine, making the green one red. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), Wood v. [read post]
