Search for: "Flemming v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 5:45 am
Facts: This case (Maney et al v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Here, former counsel established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter [*2]of law dismissing the complaint by demonstrating that their actions did not proximately cause the plaintiff’s alleged damages, and that subsequent counsel had a sufficient opportunity to protect the plaintiff’s rights (see Parklex Assoc. v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 AD3d 968, 970; Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum, & Vitulli, 215 A.D.3d 699 [2d Dept. 2023]; Park/ex Associates v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 A.D.3d 698 [2d Dept.2014 ]). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
, that he made one of them the centerpiece of "The New Property": Flemming v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:19 pm
Board members were selected to represent EU Member States, EC DGs and agencies, NSC, and industry (notably through BIAC). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Thus, Defendant Vargo continues to use the state standard rather than the federal standard, given that Ms. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Flemming v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:25 pm
The amount you can deduct as a medical expense is limited to the amount by which the cost of the special food exceeds the cost of a normal diet (Flemming v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 6:28 pm
The Florida appeals court ruled that collateral estoppel did not apply to completely bar the former employee’s civil claim, but that the trial court should not have dismissed the claim without conducting an evidentiary hearing on the stand-your-ground immunity claim (Professional Roofing and Sales, Inc v Flemmings). [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:53 am
In Professional Roofing and Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:53 am
In Professional Roofing and Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
The amount you can deduct as a medical expense is limited to the amount by which the cost of the special food exceeds the cost of a normal diet (Flemming v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:47 pm
(And I think Karen Tani's work on Flemming v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm
(And I think Karen's work on Flemming v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:49 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruling in Valle v. [read post]
