Search for: "Floyd Hodge"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2023, 1:00 am
In addition to the memorial to the petitioner’s late mother, Hodge Ch. noted images of two further non-compliant memorials within the churchyard [7]. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
Hodges in 2015. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 4:36 am
Tim Lister, Maria Kostenko and Nathan Hodge report for CNN. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
Owsley, George Floyd, General Warrants, and Cell-Site Simulators, 59 Am. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am
Hodges, holding that same-sex marriage is a fundamental constitutional right. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:46 am
Lord Sales, with whom Lord Hodge agrees, gives a dissenting judgment on Issue 2. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 7:09 am
By that time, though, George Floyd and Mike Ramos were dead and the nation and city had erupted in protest. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
On the same day Mann J handed down judgment in the case of Various Claimants v MGN [2020] EWHC 553 (Ch) (heard 28 to 31 January 2020) On 11 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) handed down judgment in the data protection case of Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 352 (heard 29 and 30 January 2020). [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
On 11 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) will hand down judgment in the data protection case of Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, (heard 29 and 30 January 2020). [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
On 26 February 2020 there was a pre-trial review before Nicol J in what promises to be one of the most high profile libel trials of the year, Johnny Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments which should be added to… [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 Nov [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Manchester United have accused the Sun newspaper of receiving advanced notice of an intended attack on the house of executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward and have made a complaint to IPSO. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
In addition to the often cited passage of Kitchin J in Generics v H Lundbeck ([2007] EWHC 1040) on the factors for obviousness, Lord Hodge added &ldq [read post]
13 May 2019, 7:39 am
Many of us cringe when we hear the names Floyd, Bonnie, Florence, Ivan, Dennis, Irma, Matthew and Michael. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
The Court of Appeal, composed of Kitchin LJ, Floyd LJ and Lewison LJ allowed the appeal on the ground of obviousness, and declared the ‘181 Patent invalid [2017] EWCA Civ 1671. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
Particularly, Lord Sumption, together with Lord Reed, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs, found that if claims 1 and 3 had been valid, they would not have been infringed, but differed in their reasons. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
Today the court handed down its reasons for those conclusions, the unanimous decision being given by its President, Lord Neuberger, and the other Supreme Court justices, Lords Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge, agreeing with it. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
Today the court handed down its reasons for those conclusions, the unanimous decision being given by its President, Lord Neuberger, and the other Supreme Court justices, Lords Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge, agreeing with it. [read post]
