Search for: "Floyd v Thomas" Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
” Mark Esper, Trump’s former defense secretary, has warned of “more … hyper-aggressive behavior” by Trump if he takes office, recounting when Trump asked if demonstrators gathering around the White House following the death of George Floyd could be shot. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am by SHG
Fairfax County School Board, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, Alito was right. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
To return to the words of Sir Thomas Bingham in John v MGN Limited which I referred to earlier, the impugned post did not touch on Ms O’Neill’s personal integrity, professional reputation, honour, courage, loyalty or the core attributes of her personality. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
  Judge Lock referred the motion to another judge, James Floyd Ammons, Jr., who denied it. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
Many workplaces instituted diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) practices following the murder of George Floyd in 2020. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm by James Romoser
Breaking a 10-year span in which he did not ask any questions, Justice Clarence Thomas poses a question to Ilana Eisenstein in Voisine v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
But to date only Justice Thomas has indicated an interest in revisiting the Court’s immunity decisions. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 11:23 am by Ilya Somin
" In his dissent in the Court's last major gun rights ruling, McDonald v. [read post]