Search for: "Food Vendors v. Vendor Panel" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
CAUTION: These WCAB panel decisions have not been designated a “significant panel decision” by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 9:19 am by Samir B. Dahman
Raimondo instructed a subordinate to direct Oberlin’s food vendor to stop supplying Oberlin with food from Gibson’s. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:41 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
But if you do choose to pre-record yourself nodding and sipping coffee, spend your free time listening to Marlene’s summary of the recent copyright litigation of Thomson Reuters v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:02 am by Kristian Soltes
Blow to Applicants in UK Class Actions as Mastercard Wins Right to AppealLexology – July 30, 2019 The UK class action regime must take a break whilst the Supreme Court (UKSC) hears the appeal in Merricks v MasterCard concerning the proper approach to certification of a class action. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Newby Foods Ltd) v Food Standards Agency, heard 30 Jan 2019. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
In a ruling by summary order, the panel concluded that none of the three sets of statements at issue constituted a material misstatement or omission (Martin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
Do you Have a Medical Device When thinking about potential FDA exposure and wanting to consult an FDA lawyer, remember that one of the first things FDA does is classify (or categorize) your product into one of the major regulatory categories, such as: Food Dietary supplement Cosmetic Drug (OTC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Iceland Foods Ltd v Berry (Valuation Officer), heard 25 Jan 2018. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:39 am by Jane Bambauer
This is why Spokeo was presumed to be subject to the FCRA in the recent Supreme Court case, Spokeo v. [read post]