Search for: "Ford v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
But in Texas, doctors face criminal liability under the general prohibition and they face the possibility of being sued by any one of a huge variety of other actors if they continue. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
” However, Ford was plainly wrong about the Founders’ understanding of “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” and about the precedent created by subsequent impeachment cases. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
A federal judge in North Dakota rejected a lawsuit seeking to prevent the Justice Department from implementing the new restrictions. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Cassidy Hutchinson’s Testimony Highlights Legal Risks for Trump Yahoo News – Alan Feuer and Glenn Thrush (New York Times) | Published: 6/29/2022 The extent to which the Justice Department’s expanding criminal inquiry into the insurrection at the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Michael Horowitz, Justice Department inspector general. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm by fjhinojosa
Cass, Motive And Opportunity: Courts’ Intrusions Into Discretionary Decisions Of Other Branches–A Comment On Department Of Commerce V. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Kent (Southern District of Texas) was impeached for sexually assaulting his female legal aides and then lying about it to the FBI and the Justice Department. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Department of Justice (where she received the Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service – the department’s highest award for employee performance – as part of the team responsible for implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm by Adam Feldman
Many of the leading issues involve criminal justice or due process concerns. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Sessions, in which the justices will consider how to interpret a provision of the criminal-removal statute. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
The denial in Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Hittson’s departure was met with a short concurrence from Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justice Kagan, and sighs of relief from Supreme Court beat reporters grateful they’ll never have to explain it. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:09 am by Steve Hall
Langley, also unsealed the inmate's medical record from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court established standards to assess whether severely mentally ill inmates are competent to be executed in a 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]