Search for: "Foster v. Jacob"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
Supreme Court has indeed ruled on laws of this nature, drawing the conclusion that you cite above in the 1982 Enmund v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:21 am
Relying on Holodook v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 5:09 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:24 am
In the March 16, 2022 opinion in Jacobs v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
See Amato v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
V. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
Perry v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am
Jacobs ed., 2022). [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:45 am
” Griffin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 5:19 am
We hope to spur intellectual property scholars to explore how the tools of deliberately intersectional feminist and queer theory can shed new light on the challenge of creating intellectual property law that fosters social justice. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
The core dispute concerned the authorship of the screenplay of the film “Florence Foster Jenkins” about the eponymous American socialite who believed herself to be a talented operatic singer but, in truth, was the polar opposite. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:11 am
Jacobs Debrauwere LLP U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Sir Robin Jacob, giving the leading judgment, stated that a wide view was intended in the construction of the disclosure as “a function of HMRC” and could extend to the function of “raising more tax revenue“. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
In the second case, Kaley v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Sir Robin Jacob, giving the leading judgment, stated that a wide view was intended in the construction of the disclosure as “a function of HMRC” and could extend to the function of “raising more tax revenue“. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
Bill gratefully acknowledges the research and analysis of Jacob Hopkins in preparing this article, which does not represent the views of any firm or client. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
This case is no exception.The case is Southerland v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
In Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 1:35 am
Cue, Kat Friend, Sir Robin Jacob (UCL). [read post]
