Search for: "Foster v. US Dept. of Justice"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
LP (1st Dept 2011), Stone v Frederick (3d Dept 1997), and Giaimo v EGA Associates (1st Dept 2009), cement the concept that, where the by-laws do not overtly give the president the right to commence litigation, and there is board or shareholder deadlock about the propriety of doing so, the president then lacks the authority to bring an action directly in the name of the corporation. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For at least some of the Constitution, I agree with Justice Harlan's famous dissent in Poe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Instead, she denied any mental health-related issues and maintained that the child remained in foster care because the agency wanted to fraudulently collect foster care payments from the government. [read post]
The Oral Partnership Operating as a Corporation: Is it a Partnership? A Corporation? Can it be Both?
15 Mar 2021, 4:59 am
Rule #2: An oral agreement to form a partnership or joint venture for an indefinite period creates a partnership or joint venture at will (see Foster v Kovner, 44 AD3d 23 [1st Dept 2007]). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Justice Dillon noted that allegations of adultery present unique issues of proof. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
The foster mother testified that the child called Joseph T. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
It contains an important proviso that such reports notify the recipients that the information shall be kept confidential, shall be used only in connection with the child protective, foster care or related proceedings under the Family Court Act and may not be re-disclosed except as necessary for such proceeding or proceedings and as authorized by law. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Family litigation can be used strategically to control an ex-spouse and cause harm to them. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:02 am
This also has been alleged to not have been complied with, in the suit.3) US Dept. of Justice release Amicus Brief in favor of Led Zeppelin in infamous Copyright SuitAnalyzing the 'thin' copyright provision in the US, the US Deptartment of Justice, giving reasons akin to that of the trial judge, sided with Led Zeppelin in the Stairway to Heaven case. previously… [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:33 am
Corp. v Carter, 99 AD3d 692, 693 [2d Dept 2012] [internal quotations marks omitted]). [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
It was not disputed that marital funds were used to create both businesses and that both were marital property. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Panel - Feminist Perspectives on Health Law and Bioethics Moderator – Lindsay Wiley, American University Washington College of Law, Feminist Health Justice Greer Donley, University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Regulation of Encapsulated Placenta Seema Mohapatra, Indiana University School of Law, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Health Law Opinions Jessica Roberts, University of Houston Law Center, Reclaiming Rights in Genetic Data as Feminist F. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
But Justice Gorsuch's predilections of meaning tells us nothing of the meaning Congress might have used. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:40 am
Additionally, plaintiff’s section 487 cause of action lacks the requisite particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, affirmed. [read post]
