Search for: "Fountain v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2024, 3:01 am by jonathanturley
” While the Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 23-310Issue: Whether the administrative law principles articulated in Kisor v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Paul (1969) held that this term includes "recreational areas" and not just places for spectators to watch events (as in the theaters, concert halls, and stadiums that are listed in the same subsection); United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:10 pm by Josh Blackman
Georgia: "The Constitution of the United States is the only fountain from which I shall draw; the only authority to which I shall appeal. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
The certification also stated plaintiff “[understood] that [defendant] reserve[d] the right to null and void the auction and sale of the unit for any reason. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
” First, the court found the first part of the test satisfied because “state-provided education is ubiquitous throughout all but the earlier days of the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:00 am by Kevin Goldberg
Google, Inc., the case that adopted that test, which was decided by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in 2006 and affirmed by the Ninth Circuit in 2007. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:47 am by Wystan Ackerman
Merely because there are millions of persons with mobility disabilities in the United States and it might be fair to assume that at least 40 of them experienced the alleged access issues at the defendant’s restaurants was not enough. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
§§ 1481 and 1484, which require true and accurate information on invoices and entry documents.Government lawyers allege in United States v. [read post]