Search for: "Francis v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 6:08 am
Francis was the special master during the negotiations that led to the 1985 consent decree in the United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:00 am
United States could have dramatic ramifications not just for the tax code but also for the method used to interpret the Constitution. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
I suspect it never enjoyed a United States copyright--which makes it an even more apt hypothetical in the context of Golan.] [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:55 am
United States. [read post]
St. Francis Health System, Inc. pays $36.5 million to settle False Claims Act and Anti-kickback case
16 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
Lee v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:26 am
As my co-blogger Dan Solove noted, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Michel V. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am
Michel V. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:04 pm
Joshua T Carback (University of Maryland, Francis King Carey School of Law, Students) has posted Ocasio v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Michel V. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:23 pm
Carback (University of Maryland, Francis King Carey School of Law, Students) has posted Ocasio v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:08 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 8:59 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:15 am
We therefore vacate the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Spatt, J.) [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Francis failed to depart the United States as required by the visa. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
FCC, 736 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 2013), petition filed, No. 13-1124 (March 17, 2014), urges the Supreme Court of the United States to overrule Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
