Search for: "Fraser v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2023, 6:27 am
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal. 5th 903, 416 P.3d 1, 232 Cal. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
In UFCW v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 8:06 am
Evergreen East Cooperative v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
Fraser J focused in particular on the enquiry whether “the parent company is better placed, because of its superior knowledge or expertise” to avoid the particular type of harm incurred by the claimants, and whether the subsidiary placed reliance on the superior expertise of the parent. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
R. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm
In a 15-page decision, Ontario Superior Court Justice Breese Davies ruled that the section is an unjustifiable restriction on Canadians’ right to free speech. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:31 pm
School Dist.), (2) vulgar (Fraser v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:48 am
In Peiroo v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:52 am
In March 2017, the Superior Court of Justice allowed Huang’s claim in part. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
In a similar case out of Los Angeles, Fraser v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:24 pm
This was no more apparent than the Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 12:08 am
The IPKat is delighted to host a guest contribution by Simon Chapman (Lewis Silkin) on this very topic and on a case (Jack Wills v House of Fraser) in which he and his team have acted for the defendant.Here's what Simon writes:"Following Mr Justice Arnold’s finding (Jack Wills Limited v House of Fraser (Stores) Limited [2014] EWHC 110 (Ch)) that retailer House of Fraser was liable for trade mark infringement and passing… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm
Therefore, it was entitled to the protections contained in that contract to the same extent as Outspan, under the third party beneficiary principles stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in such cases as in Fraser River Pile & Dredge Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 2:32 pm
The case is Matsqui First Nation v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 10:17 am
SFL v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:43 am
Galati claims the Act stipulates only Court of Appeal and Superior Court judges, or a lawyer who has been a member of the bar for at least 10 years, can be appointed. [read post]
