Search for: "Freitas v. Freitas"
Results 1 - 20
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am
Written by Eduardo Silva de Freitas (Erasmus University Rotterdam), member of the Vici project Affordable Access to Justice, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO), www.euciviljustice.eu. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
Shaun de Freitas addresses the recent case of Gaum v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
There may be some other way in which the hypothetical ordinary reasonable reader would identify him/her: Economou v de Freitas [2017] EMLR 4, [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (27 July 2016) [9] … 21. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:45 am
R v de Freitas held that the Crown must prove more than the potential for endangerment and that the child was actually endangered. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:13 pm
Written by Eduardo Silva de Freitas (Erasmus University Rotterdam) & Xandra Kramer (Erasmus University Rotterdam/Utrecht University), members of the Vici project Affordable Access to Justice, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO), www.euciviljustice.eu. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 10:23 am
In Freitas v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 1:57 pm
Finally, in view of the UKSC’s finding of non-infringement of Article 6 ECHR in Coventry v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm
If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
ON 23 March 2022 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of United the Union v Freitas [2022] EWHC 666 (QB). [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
Freitas, 800 F.2d 1451, 1456 (9th Cir. 1986). [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
Freitas, 800 F.2d 1451, 1456 (9th Cir. 1986). [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 3:43 am
Since his appointment he has given judgment in a wide range of important defamation, privacy and data protection cases including, for example: Yeo v Times Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWHC 3375 (QB) Lachaux v Independent Print [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) Economou v de Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB) Hourani v Thomson [2017] EWHC 432 (QB) NT1 and NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) Lloyd… [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
The case provides some Supreme Court guidance on section 4, largely endorsing the decision in Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591, whilst adding some refinement on the legal analysis provided therein. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
Warby J’s approach was endorsed by the Court of Appeal (Economou v De Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591 – see our blog here). [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:07 pm
On the Defendants’ section 4 public interest defence, Nicklin J relied on Warby J’s questions from Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591 [87]: was the statement complained of, or did it form part of, a statement on a matter of public interest? [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am
Freitas, 800 F.2d 1451, 1456 (9th Cir. 1986). [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
Economou v De Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591 Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland [2019] EWCA Civ 648. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:45 am
– Persephone Bridgman Baker Libel Injunctions: Time to revisit the rule in Bonnard v Perryman? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm
The existence of a ‘public interest’ defence The Court of Appeal set out the law as it stands following the case of Economou v De Freitas [2018] EWCA 2591 (at [44] – [48]) as well as identifying the relevant principles for determining the meaning of “public interest” (at [33] – [35]). [read post]
