Search for: "Friedman v Friedman" Results 1 - 20 of 2,037
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm by John Elwood
Simon, which is on its second trip to the Supreme Court (and is making its second appearance in Relist Watch), as well as Friedman v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Friedman, P.C., 153 AD3d 1250, 1252 [2d Dept 2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Havell v Islam, 292 AD2d 210, 210 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
It is arguably a necessary power in order to meet the contingencies that arise over time.In the leading American case, Jackson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am by Andy Gillin
Take a look, and let us know some of your favorite legal documentaries in the comments section, or on our Facebook page Hot Coffee aka The Famous Mcdonalds Lawsuit and Tort Reform Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
The Panel included: Adrian Fulford, Judge Theodor Meron, Amal Clooney, Danny Friedman, Baroness Helena Kennedy, and Elizabeth Wilmshurst. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
           Friedman v Town of Dunkirk Zoning Board of Appeals, 2023 WL 7983385 (NYAD 4 Dept. 11/17/2023) [read post]