Search for: "Friedman v. Friedman"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
The Panel included: Adrian Fulford, Judge Theodor Meron, Amal Clooney, Danny Friedman, Baroness Helena Kennedy, and Elizabeth Wilmshurst. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:42 am
Friedman v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
Friedman and Joanna L. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:19 am
” In “THIS CASE: Tiffany Plaza Condominium Association v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
Friedman Contact: customslawblog@gmail.com Twitter: @customslawblog (c) 2020 All Rights Reserved. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court issued the decision in Roe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm
Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 9:53 am
"This comes up in relation to the Court of International Trade decision in Trijicon, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Concur—Kapnick, J.P., Friedman, González, O’Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:34 pm
Friedman Contact: customslawblog@gmail.com Twitter: @customslawblog (c) 2020 All Rights Reserved. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:03 am
So holds the Ohio Court of Appeals in S.E. v. [read post]