Search for: "Front, Inc. v Khalil"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am
The law provides absolute immunity from liability for defamation based on oral or written statements made by attorneys in connection with a proceeding before a court “ ’when such words and writings are material and pertinent to the questions involved’ ” (Front, Inc. v Khalil, 24 NY3d 713, 718 [2015], quoting Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; see Weinstock v Sanders, 144 AD3d 1019, 1020… [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
The law provides absolute immunity from liability for defamation based on oral or written statements made by attorneys in connection with a proceeding before a court “ ’when such words and writings are material and pertinent to the questions involved’ ” (Front, Inc. v Khalil, 24 NY3d 713, 718 [2015], quoting Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; see Weinstock v Sanders, 144 AD3d 1019, 1020… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:11 am
“The alleged statements made by defendant Conley in the course of litigation are immune from liability for defamation based on an absolute privilege (see Front, Inc. v Khalil, 24 NY3d 713, 718 [2015]). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
The law provides absolute immunity from liability for defamation based on oral or written statements made by attorneys in connection with a proceeding before a court ” when such words and writings are material and pertinent to the questions involved'” (Front, Inc. v Khalil, 24 NY3d 713, 718, quoting Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219; see Weinstock v Sanders, 144 AD3d 1019, 1020; see also Stega v New York… [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:57 am
(Front, Inc. v Khalil, 24 NY3d 713, 718 [2015].) [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:16 am
In Front, Inc. v Khalil, 24 NY3d 713 [2015], New York’s highest court extended the privilege against defamation to pre-litigation statements, like demand or cease-and-desist letters. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:49 pm
The payment to McDougal was made by American Media Inc. [read post]