Search for: "G. V."
Results 1 - 20
of 19,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
.# # #DECISIONS. v G. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:48 am
The mark was found to be invalid for being contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality, and applies the CJEU's guidance from the FACK JU GÖHTE judgment in detail. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am
This article considers the position as to proof of foreign law in the English courts in light of the case of FS Nile Plaza v Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45 and the 11th edition of the Commercial Court Guide. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:30 pm
" Thomas G. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:07 am
Bryony G. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:31 am
Courts note, “[g]enerally, a written disclosure statement and a plan of reorganization must [also] be filed with the court. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Because the petition raises an issue of substantial evidence, we treat it as though it had been properly transferred to this Court in accordance with CPLR 7804(g) (see Matter of 16 Cypress Ave Realty LLC v New York City Loft Bd., 215 AD3d 418, 419 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Because the petition raises an issue of substantial evidence, we treat it as though it had been properly transferred to this Court in accordance with CPLR 7804(g) (see Matter of 16 Cypress Ave Realty LLC v New York City Loft Bd., 215 AD3d 418, 419 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm
Tseytlin had a hard time believing that Chief Justice John G. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On the same day there was a hearing Titan v Okunola KB-2024-000960. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:42 am
Over to Agathe and Hiske who take us to Munich back to 10 October 2023 in the 10x Genomics v NanoString case: "While a lot has been written on the 10x Genomics v NanoString PI decision from the Munich Local Division where in injunction was issued (see for example this IPKat article), there is another decision from the Munich Local Division on preliminary proceedings between the same parties in relation to the same technology which has not received… [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on May 1, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department ANGELA G. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on May 1, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department ANGELA G. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:16 pm
Clagett, III, Elizabeth G. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 8:00 am
”In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
“[I]nferring bad faith based on the racial effects of a political gerrymander in a jurisdiction in which race and partisan preference are very closely correlated” would, Alito suggested, allow litigants and courts to circumvent the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
