Search for: "GIBBS v. GIBBS" Results 1 - 20 of 289
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 pm by Simon Gibbs
Costs webinar from Kings Chambers’ Matthew Smith and Paul Hughes discussing how the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15 affects the way that solicitors ought to perform retainers dealing with the administration of estates and the likelihood and course of assessment of their […] The post Costs webinar on Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP first appeared on Legal Costs Specialists - Gibbs Wyatt Stone. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:00 pm by Simon Gibbs
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Hadley v Przybylo [2024] EWCA Civ 250 is something of a curiosity. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Afflicted with a “culture of complacency[1],” the Ontario Superior Court has long struggled to timely advance cases to trial. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:29 pm by Kurt R. Karst
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Jeffrey N. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm by Kurt R. Karst
First, FDA notes that the Agency is “currently working to enhance our Third-Party Review Program, which was reauthorized under MDUFA V. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am by Joseph L. Hyde
  That’s the question the prosecutor asked a witness in State v Gibbs. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Gibbs —For more than three decades, FDA has claimed that the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic (FD&C Act) gives the agency legal authority to regulate laboratory developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices (see our prior post here). [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am by Christin Thompson
Medicare Exclusion Risks: Employing Excluded Individuals Can Result in Significant Administrative, Civil and / or Criminal Liabilities (May 8, 2023): One of the most severe administrative sanctions available under the Social Security Act stems from the authority of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)[1] to “exclude” individuals and entities from participating in Federal health care programs.[2] While the… [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:52 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  FDA has in fact asserted this position in the past: CRL v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 7 December 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Schlumberger v Gibbs and another (QB-2019-004261). [read post]