Search for: "GONZALEZ V. CATHOLIC"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
It is black-letter law, as the Supreme Court held in 2020 in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
Cuomo[9] protected Catholics' religious gatherings, but its companion case was Agudath Israel of America v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
Henderson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
(See Lent v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm
Gonzalez (2006). [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Davis, 18-6943 Issues: (1) Whether Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 11:03 am
In Cary v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
Wade is Garza v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 4:10 am
In Martinez-Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:11 pm
Relying on the Court of Justice’s decisions in Google Spain v APED and Gonzalez C‑131/12 and Weltimmo v Nemzeti Adatvedelmi C‑230/14, the court held that Facebook Ireland is a data controller for the purposes of section 5 of the DPA and can therefore be liable under this Act. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
LEXIS 181873, Dec. 16, 2016) and permitted an inmate to proceed with his complaint that he was not given meatless meals on Good Friday and that Catholic Easter services were not available even though they were proved to Protestant prisoners.In Stein v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
Gonzalez, 2015 U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 11:49 am
’” Again quoting Justice O’Connor on the subject in the case of Catholic Charities of Sacramento, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St.Louis, et al. (11-840). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:50 pm
In fact, while the Supreme Court originally held in its 1929 decision Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
If you wanted, you could read Employment Division v. [read post]