Search for: "GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION OF NON STOP PAY OUT"
Results 1 - 20
of 258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Her death sparked outcry from human rights advocates, who urged the government to reform the lèse-majesté (royal insult) law and to stop persecuting State critics. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
The majority’s misinterpretation of the exemption renders the statute in violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as the Wisconsin Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Congress hoped it would help stop money-laundering by rooting out the use of anonymous shell companies and would track the flow of illicit money and protect U.S. national security interests. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
The commission is tasked with processing and publishing a huge volume of campaign records, investigating reports of violations, proposing improvements in local ethics laws, and rooting out corruption. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
Soon after Janus, Alaska’s newly elected governor Michael Dunleavy requested a review which determined that the state lacked “clear and compelling” evidence that public employees had waived their First Amendment rights in agreeing to pay agency fees because (1) there was no indication union members were informed of the constitutional rights at stake; (2) there was no indication the consent was freely given; and (3) employees had a limited ability… [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
” MARCH A federal judge temporarily blocked Texas prosecutors from enforcing current and 60-year-old state laws against organizations that help people travel out of state to have abortions. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Seventh Circuit: The Supreme Court told us to stop doing those. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 7:31 am
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a non-partisan, non-profit organization that tracks budgetary matters, said recently that agencies and services that could be affected include the National Park Service, government grant programs, certain applications at the Internal Revenue Service, and the government’s ability to send out SNAP benefits. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
" If you successfully sue state government officials for violating the Constitution, you can usually get attorneys' fees. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
This is the sort of thinking that goes by the name of "polluter pays" in environmental contexts, "sin taxes" in morals-regulation contexts, and "Pigouvian taxes" in public-finance contexts. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 12:30 pm
Unreasonable extension of a stop? [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
I am, after all, a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (lapsed), upper-middle class and non-LGBTQ+. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am
And “even in the absence of an employer-employee relationship[,] one may be vicariously liable if [one] has the right and ability to supervise the infringing activity and also has a direct financial interest in such activities. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
While some lobbyists are doling out cash, others are fearful any type of public opposition to the former president could make them persona non grata in Washington should he get back to the White House. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
Circuit: We think they mean "aid and abet" a criminal violation, which is clear and narrow enough to be constitutional. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm
Barenberg correctly points out that many employers have a perverse incentive not to stop illegal behavior in the workplace. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The borrowers are just in default.In my Verdictcolumn last Thursday, I specifically called out that assertion for its utter incoherence, noting that McConnell’s argument would have us believe that people’s proper “response to non-payment … is not to question whether the promise on which we relied is valid. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:00 am
Thomas Peters also was ordered to pay a $50,000 fine for his role in the corruption case. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Twitter later changed the label to “government-funded media. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
He is supported by bipartisan House leadership in arguing the speech or debate clause of the Constitution bars the Justice Department from seeing the phone contents. [read post]
