Search for: "Gallagher v Crotty"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 4:22 am
In many if not most of these cases, the pre-amendment provision retains at least some of the protections found in Section 417 (b)’s default rule against adverse impact on the non-consenting members, as illustrated in a case decided earlier this year called Gallagher v Crotty. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 9:14 pm
Gallagher, 69 N.Y.2d 525 (1987)). [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:22 am
” Gallagher v Crotty In Gallagher, the plaintiff 25% member claimed that the defendants squeezed him out of several LLCs involved in affordable housing development. [read post]
