Search for: "Gallo v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:18 pm
(See Gallo v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Chiara Gallo summarised the latest news and opportunities in IP here. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm
The Transfers In the parties’ agreement (read here), Gallo and Sweet Revenge expressly represented and warranted that Gallo “created and/or wrote the Story as an employee-for-hire” of Sweet Revenge, and that the story “constitutes a work-made-for-hire pursuant to the United States Copyright Laws. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
In a similar vein, we are thankful for the helpful briefing and argument we received from the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Gallo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
So far, the decisions have validated the party’s state-by-state legal strategy and offered a reprieve from several Republican gerrymandering attempts before a single election could be held under the new lines. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 7:34 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:33 am
The EU should do something about Turner v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Dollinger answered in his September 18, 2020 opinion in Matthew A. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:38 am
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:30 am
United States of America et al Se ha definido las peleas de gallo como un “deporte” donde se crían gallos de pelea y se entrenan para combate a muerte entre dos de ellos. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
In re Thomas, 79 U.S.P.Q.2d 1021, 1024 (TTAB 2006) (citing Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
This statement was expressly approved by a majority of the High Court in E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 15, [43]. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Yesterday I attended and reported in detail on the Munich I Regional Court's preliminary-injunction hearing in Nokia v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Robart, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit), and Huawei v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Gallo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 6:35 am
The panel stated that the contract required Gallo to obtain subrogation waivers only for five named types of insurance listed in the supply agreement and that the inland marine policy under which Gallo submitted a claim to Travelers was not one of the listed insurance types. [read post]
