Search for: "Galvin v. Galvin" Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In view of this failure, and in the absence of a court order discharging defendants as the attorneys of record in the foreclosure action, defendants continued to represent plaintiffs in that action and their authority as the attorneys of record continued unabated (see GMAC Mtge., LLC v Galvin, 184 AD3d 750, 750-751 [2d Dept 2020]; Hess v Tyszko, 46 AD2d 980, 980 [3d Dept 1974]). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:16 pm
(Opinion, United States Supreme Court)Massachusetts Superior Court Denies Secretary of State Galvin's Motion Against RobinhoodRobinhood Financial, LLC. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 3:30 pm by Renee Anderson
” Of particular relevance to this novel, Shelley was also well aware of experiments over previous decades by Galvin and others using electricity to stimulate muscle twitches in dead animals. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:52 am by ccollins
Hoffman is accused of fraudulently selling $3.3M of unregistered securities, along with childhood friend Thomas V. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am by John Jascob
The appellate panel also rejected arguments that amended Regulation A should be vacated as arbitrary and capricious because the SEC failed to explain adequately how the rule protects investors (Lindeen v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
Galvin, supra (quoting 18 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes § 3921(a)). [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am by John Jascob
In their ongoing court challenge to the rule, regulators from Massachusetts and Montana argued that the SEC’s amendments to Regulation A violate the plain meaning of the Securities Act, overstep the Commission’s delegated authority, and strip investors of valuable state law protections (Lindeen v. [read post]