Search for: "Gamble v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Masterpiece Cakeshop again In Scardina v Masterpiece Cakeshop Inc (CO Ct App. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 1 to 6 February 2021 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 2210 The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed this appeal concerning the correct approach as to determining the value of non-negotiable chips for the purpose of calculating gaming duty. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Incorrect guesses included Disney (2 teams), Proctor & Gamble, Nike and Kraft. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:25 am by Joe Kristan
  A busy slots player can easily burn through $200,000 in “winnings,” which are above the line, offset by below-the-line gambling itemized deductions. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The travelers truthfully explained that the funds were legal gambling proceeds, not evidence of drug transactions. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm by cdw
LaSameuel Lee Gamble, 2010 Ala. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
Put simply, this refers to the situation where A causes harm to B (or to everyone) but does not suffer the costs of those harms themselves and so has no or few incentives to correct/avoid them. [read post]