Search for: "Garner v. Scott*" Results 1 - 20 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:37 pm by David M. Boertje
The February 2023 case (Sharpe v Winterville Police Department) involved a motorist who was stopped by police. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Legal historians continue to garner teaching awards! [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:22 am by Siven Watt
James Garner (November 2021) — Mental health therapy aide indicted for allegedly defrauding over $35,000 in workers’ compensation benefits. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:30 am by Camilla Hrdy
  To play Devil's Advocate, one could argue there's not necessarily anything wrong with a seller garnering secondary meaning for a feature (e.g. the Coke bottle shape) by using a design patent, and then using that secondary meaning to protect, specifically, those marketing features that consumers come to see as identifying the seller and distinguishing them from others. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
It concerns an unsuccessful appeal by the Victorian Society against the decision of the Chancellor of the Diocese of Rochester to allow the removal from the church of a Victorian eight bay screen by Bodley & Garner and its reinstallation in a church in Leicestershire, which would necessitate the reduction of the screen by two bays. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Scott Roehm argued that Biden administration officials need to reject the use of evidence obtained by torture in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:00 pm
The function took place the day after the United States Supreme Court announced its opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
As a result of their disagreements, the IRC submitted, as a first set of maps, two proposed redistricting plans to the legislature — maps from each party delegation — as is constitutionally permitted if a single consensus map fails to garner sufficient votes (see NY Const, art III, § 5-b [g]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
As a result of their disagreements, the IRC submitted, as a first set of maps, two proposed redistricting plans to the legislature — maps from each party delegation — as is constitutionally permitted if a single consensus map fails to garner sufficient votes (see NY Const, art III, § 5-b [g]). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am by Amy Howe
A year later, the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]