Search for: "Gay v. Peoples Bank" Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
Using the principles outlined in Banks v Cadwalladr [2022] EMLR 21 [100]-[135], the Judge considered three questions relevant to establishing the public interest defence: (1) Was the statement complained of on a matter of public interest, or did it form part of such a statement? [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
We will also provide an anonymous reader poll to learn more about what frequency and type of content people prefer to receive. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm by Robert George
The justices in the 6-3 majority did not give her "the right to turn away gay people. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:45 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had concluded that no distinction could be drawn between the reasons that informed each of the actions in issue: “the entire proceedings … were motivated by a concern … that, by reason of her posts, [the claimant] would be perceived as holding unacceptable views in relation to gay and trans people” [ET, para 63]. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On 17 May 2023, the Court of Appeal issued the costs order [pdf] in the long running Banks v Cadwalladr case ([2023] EWCA Civ 219). [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 9:17 am by Tom Smith
With the introduction of SSI, the current incarnation of the LGBTQ+ network—as distinct from the prior movement that fought for equal rights for gay and lesbian Americans, and which ended in 2020 with Bostock v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:55 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
    If you’re an encryption advocate in the United States, it’s time to stop pretending that encryption’s protection against oppressive governments is only about Uighurs in Xinjiang or gay people in Uganda. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2021 there was a pre-trial review in the case of Banks v Cadwalladr before Nicklin J. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]