Search for: "Gent v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 8:36 pm
In the recent decision, Gent v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
In Ivey v Genting Casinos, the Supreme Court took as its starting point that the second leg of the Ghosh test required the defendant’s acts to be measured against what “society in general expects” [58]. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
In Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67, the Supreme Court (hearing a civil case) did away with the second limb of the Ghosh test, thus making what the defendant thought about how others would regard his actions irrelevant. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am
The Supreme Court considered the test for dishonesty and concluded that the second leg of the test propounded in R v Ghosh does not correctly represent the law and directions based upon it ought no longer to be given. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 3:32 am
The team currently consists of established scholars from 15 (former) EU Member States: Austria: Andreas Schwartze (Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck) Belgium: Cedric Vanleenhove (Universiteit Gent) Bulgaria: Ilia Lassin (Sofia University St. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:24 am
The case is Gentes v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
In Fischer v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:34 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Still no Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
Ivey v Genting Casinos Ltd t/a Crockfords (expedited), heard 13 Jul 2017. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:07 am
Abstract below: Many accounts of Gideon v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
Ivey v Genting Casinos Ltd t/a Crockfords (expedited), heard 13 Jul 2017. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
Ivey v Genting Casinos Ltd t/a Crockfords (expedited), heard 13 Jul 2017. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
[1] Gent v Strone [2] Ironically the plaintiff could have demanded full payment of his statutory entitlement which he did not do. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
[1] Gent v Strone [2] Ironically the plaintiff could have demanded full payment of his statutory entitlement which he did not do. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Robert Earl Gent v. [read post]
