Search for: "Germany v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 4:21 pm
Germany (No. 2)Decision Date: March 28, 2023 The European Court of Human Rights held that Germany did not violate the rights of a journalist when it refused a request for information about the history of judges who had worked in the former German Democratic Republic (GDR) Security Service. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
Blume v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog has more informat [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
” A human operator would then evaluate if a flagged security concern necessitates action. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
The social media blog, Socially Aware, analyses the implications [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
The law draws on similar legislation in Germany and Australia and is set to be issued in the next month. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
This newest update includes leading cases ranging from the classic 1970s landmark judgment in Klass and others v Germany to the Haščák v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Landmark Supreme Court Fight Over Social Media Now Looks Likely MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 9/19/2022 Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
Internet and Social Media The Information Commissioner Office has launched a major consultation on three draft documents related to its regulatory approach: an overarching Regulatory Action Policy, Statutory Guidance on Data Protection Act 2018 Action and Statutory Guidance related to its Privacy and Electronic Communication Regulations (PECR) Powers. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Supreme Court case Holder v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
France joins Canada, Sweden, Germany and Australia, who have all condemned Clearview’s data practices. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The hearings, "Protection from Persecution: Establishing Humanitarian Pathways for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs" is intended to be a "catalyst for passage of legislation offered in the 117th Congress to extend protections for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs facing a well-founded fear of persecution, including legislation offered by CECC Commissioners. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am
I give the highlights of two new and eminently contestable cyberlaw rulings: In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
I fear that as written it may criminalize ex-spies giving security advice to Airbus, or perhaps even the Atlantic Council. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
Pix Credit: Council of Europe--Paris Principles at 25. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:51 am
Llewellyn, Fenwick & West LLP, on Sunday, April 11, 2021 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, ESG, Human capital, Management, Tech companies Supreme Court to Weigh in on Presumption of Reliance in Securities Class Actions: Goldman Sachs v. [read post]
