Search for: "Gonzales v. Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Court held possession of a gun was not economic (in Lopez), but that possession of marijuana for home use was (in Gonzales v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 10:44 am by Jon Sands
Gonzales, 446 F.3d1121 (9th Cir 2006)(en band). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:08 pm
Davis (1998) 19 Cal.4th 301, 305; Williams, at pp. 782-783.) [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:00 pm by Jessica Pieklo
Just a few years later the Court would reverse course from Stenberg and uphold the federal “partial birth abortion ban” in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:02 pm by Jon Sands
The jury instruction was thus proper under Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
That was the government’s approach, albeit a losing one, in Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Parke Davis & Co., 520 F.2d 1359, 1362 (4th Cir. 1975). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160)… [read post]
Supreme Court later upheld this federal law, the Controlled Substances Act, or CSA, against a challenge contending that Congress did not have the power to regulate local, medicinal marijuana possession and use in 2003, in the well-known Gonzales v. [read post]